The latest news from ekklesia on theology and politics from a christian perspective

The latest news from ekklesia on theology and politics from a christian perspective

By staff writers
19 May 2003

Clergy appeal for prisoners in camp x-ray rejected

-19/5/03

The Supreme Court in the USA has rejected an appeal by clergy against the detention of hundreds of U.S. prisoners in camp x-ray,who were picked up in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

Lower federal courts had prevously blocked the legal challenge on grounds that the group did not have legal standing.

The clergy sued President Bush, Defence Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and others last year.

"The United States government violated basic principles of international human rights law in forcibly removing prisoners of war from Afghanistan, transporting them to Guantanamo, and holding them indefinitely in small outdoor cages," the clergy group alleged.

The suit claimed the prisoners were deprived of their liberty and have not been informed of the accusations against them, in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

The coalition demanded that the government provide the prisoners with lawyers, bring them before a U.S. court, acknowledge their identities and define the charges against them. The detainees are from some 36 countries.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to address the merits of those complaints.

To have standing to represent the detainees in court, the San Francisco-based federal appeals court said, the coalition would need to have had a pre-existing relationship with the detainees or prove that the prisoners had mental defects.

The court declined to rule on whether individual prisoners could bring cases.

The government says federal courts have no power over U.S. military policy carried out in a foreign nation as part of the nation's war on terrorism.

The detainees began arriving at the U.S. naval base in Cuba in January 2002.

The United States is holding approximately 680 prisoners from 42 nations, including several children. The government refuses to identify them.

Clergy appeal for prisoners in camp x-ray rejected

-19/5/03

The Supreme Court in the USA has rejected an appeal by clergy against the detention of hundreds of U.S. prisoners in camp x-ray,who were picked up in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

Lower federal courts had prevously blocked the legal challenge on grounds that the group did not have legal standing.

The clergy sued President Bush, Defence Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and others last year.

"The United States government violated basic principles of international human rights law in forcibly removing prisoners of war from Afghanistan, transporting them to Guantanamo, and holding them indefinitely in small outdoor cages," the clergy group alleged.

The suit claimed the prisoners were deprived of their liberty and have not been informed of the accusations against them, in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

The coalition demanded that the government provide the prisoners with lawyers, bring them before a U.S. court, acknowledge their identities and define the charges against them. The detainees are from some 36 countries.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to address the merits of those complaints.

To have standing to represent the detainees in court, the San Francisco-based federal appeals court said, the coalition would need to have had a pre-existing relationship with the detainees or prove that the prisoners had mental defects.

The court declined to rule on whether individual prisoners could bring cases.

The government says federal courts have no power over U.S. military policy carried out in a foreign nation as part of the nation's war on terrorism.

The detainees began arriving at the U.S. naval base in Cuba in January 2002.

The United States is holding approximately 680 prisoners from 42 nations, including several children. The government refuses to identify them.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 England & Wales License. Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.