news from ekklesia

By staff writers
March 21, 2004

Church anger over Lib Dem vote on porn

-21/3/04

Church groups and children's campaigners have denounced Liberal Democrat calls for change in the law to allow 16-year-olds to view pornography.

A majority of delegates at the party's spring conference in Southport on Saturday approved calls for laws on pornography to be relaxed, reports the BBC.

They voted in favour of allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to visit sex shops, which would be made easier to set up and run.

But the NSPCC and churches including the Church of England attacked the plans.

A spokeswoman for the NSPCC said: "We believe that this is a step in the wrong direction."

Angela Perkins, of the National Board of Catholic Women, said she was "speechless" at the news.

She said: "For a political party to say we think 16 is actually an adequate age to release children on to pornography is irresponsible.

"It's going backwards to the 18th Century.

"Sex is the only diet we are giving our children - this is almost like saying, 'That's fine, anything goes'."

A Church of England spokesman said it was opposed to all pornography because of the issue of exploitation.

"It is irrelevant whether you can appear in it at 16 or 116," he said.

"If it were to reduce protection, particularly for the most vulnerable, that would be regrettable."

"With all the problems facing Britain, the Liberal Democrats have once again chosen to focus on the absurd and the obscure."

Lib Dem culture spokesman Don Foster had championed the softer line on porn.

He said 16- and 17-year-olds were "living in a twilight zone between childhood and adulthood", saying they were old enough to have sex and babies but could not watch explicit material.

Church anger over Lib Dem vote on porn

-21/3/04

Church groups and children's campaigners have denounced Liberal Democrat calls for change in the law to allow 16-year-olds to view pornography.

A majority of delegates at the party's spring conference in Southport on Saturday approved calls for laws on pornography to be relaxed, reports the BBC.

They voted in favour of allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to visit sex shops, which would be made easier to set up and run.

But the NSPCC and churches including the Church of England attacked the plans.

A spokeswoman for the NSPCC said: "We believe that this is a step in the wrong direction."

Angela Perkins, of the National Board of Catholic Women, said she was "speechless" at the news.

She said: "For a political party to say we think 16 is actually an adequate age to release children on to pornography is irresponsible.

"It's going backwards to the 18th Century.

"Sex is the only diet we are giving our children - this is almost like saying, 'That's fine, anything goes'."

A Church of England spokesman said it was opposed to all pornography because of the issue of exploitation.

"It is irrelevant whether you can appear in it at 16 or 116," he said.

"If it were to reduce protection, particularly for the most vulnerable, that would be regrettable."

"With all the problems facing Britain, the Liberal Democrats have once again chosen to focus on the absurd and the obscure."

Lib Dem culture spokesman Don Foster had championed the softer line on porn.

He said 16- and 17-year-olds were "living in a twilight zone between childhood and adulthood", saying they were old enough to have sex and babies but could not watch explicit material.

Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.