Royal succession bill debate 'a sad day for democracy', says Republic

By staff writers
January 24, 2013

The campaign group Republic has criticised Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg for “railroading” his succession bill through parliament without allowing a full debate on the monarchy.

Republic said the debate in the House of Commons "highlighted the woeful state of Britain’s democratic culture and showed a complete disrespect for the British people."

The Succession to the Crown Bill received its second reading and committee stages on 22 January. MPs from both sides of the house criticised the government for not scheduling enough time to discuss the issues raised by the bill.

Amendments that would have led to a debate on an elected head of state were not selected by the speaker.

Republic’s chief executive Graham Smith said: “We’ve always said this bill is pointless tinkering: the monarchy still discriminates against every other person in the country and anti-Catholic discrimination will be further entrenched in law.”

“There is no excuse for not allowing a full and wide-ranging debate about the issues the bill raises. Clegg has railroaded this through parliament without giving MPs a chance to fully consider its implications. This has been a sad day for democracy.”

He concluded: “This was a missed opportunity to look seriously at our constitutional arrangements and the future of the monarchy. Public reaction to issues such as the royal veto and the costs of the monarchy shows there is an appetite for serious change – it’s a shame Nick Clegg denied MPs the chance to debate real reform.”


Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.