Military commission process at Guantánamo 'inherently unfair'

By agency reporter
February 10, 2015

A US military court hearing about five alleged plotters of the 11 September 2001 attacks was abruptly halted on 9 February 2015.

This is just the latest in a string of serious incidents that have marked the inherently unfair military commission process at Guantánamo Bay, Amnesty International claimed in response.

Minutes after the hearing began, the military judge called a recess after one of the defendants, Yemeni national Ramzi bin al-Shibh, told the court he had previously seen a court-appointed interpreter in CIA black sites where detainees had been tortured.

"If these allegations are true, then the interpreter's presence alongside the former black site detainees is deeply unsettling. The defence teams should be able to interview him as a likely witness to torture and enforced disappearance,” said Anne FitzGerald, Director of the Research and Crisis Response Programme at Amnesty, who was present in the courtroom in Guantánamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba.

“The release of the Senate torture report and today's developments during the military commission hearing put the US government in a paradoxical situation: the courtroom at Guantánamo Bay is piling further injustice on top of impunity for torture.”

The hearing was the first in the case of the alleged 9/11 plotters since the December 2014 release of a Senate committee report summary detailing torture methods used as part of a secret US detention and interrogation programme.

* Amnesty International:


Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.