US withdraws from global anti-corruption initiative

By agency reporter
November 4, 2017

The US Department of Interior has announced that the US will withdraw from implementing the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), a multi-stakeholder global anti-corruption programme for the oil, gas and mining sector. As one of the organisations instrumental to the creation of the EITI, Global Witness strongly opposes the U.S. retreat from this important initiative, and the signal it will send to other countries and companies.

The move was an inevitable result of the insistence of major U.S. oil companies ExxonMobil and Chevron on keeping their US tax payments secret. In addition, earlier this year, these companies led the attack on a related US regulation that required extractive companies to publish their payments to governments around the world.

“We strongly dispute the US government’s claim that US laws prevent compliance with the EITI standard when it is Exxon and Chevron’s preference for secrecy that made it impossible for the US to comply,” said Corinna Gilfillan, Head of US. Office at Global Witness. “When major Russian and Chinese oil companies are disclosing more information about their deals around the world than their US counterparts, you have got to ask: what are Exxon and Chevron so desperate to hide?”

The United States, once a pioneer of international transparency, was the first country to enact an extractive payment transparency law in 2010, known as the bipartisan Cardin-Lugar Amendment or Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Act. That law, which inspired thirty other countries to follow suit, remains in force, but has yet to be implemented after years of delays caused by aggressive litigation and lobbying by the American Petroleum Institute.

Corruption in the natural resources sector is not only a moral issue: it is also an issue of national security importance. “More corruption means more conflicts around the globe, including in EITI countries like Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen where American troops are stationed. By choosing not to implement the requirements of the EITI, the US will send a message to other EITI members that they, too, can opt out of it, which would increase the potential for conflict and put US troops at risk,” said Gilfillan.

* Global Witness


Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.