European anti-torture ruling shows need for UK public inquiry, say campaigners

By agency reporter
June 2, 2018

In a significant anti-torture ruling, the European Court of Human Rights has held that Lithuania and Romania violated the rights of Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri by allowing them to be detained at CIA ‘black sites’ on European soil.

Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri was subjected to “inhuman treatment” at the secret prison in Romania, which operated from 2003-2005. Abu Zubaydah was tortured at a black site in Lithuania that the CIA ran from 2005-6. The new CIA director, Gina Haspel, oversaw the torture of Mr al Nashiri at a CIA black site in Thailand in 2002.

Romania and Lithuania also allowed the CIA to transfer the men to other prisons, the judges found, exposing them to “a foreseeable serious risk of further ill-treatment”.

This ruling comes shortly after the UK Government’s unreserved apology to Abdul Hakim Belhaj and Fatima Boudchar, who were abducted by the CIA with British help and rendered to Libya, despite the likelihood they would be tortured by Muammar Gaddafi’s secret service.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Tony Blair, who was Prime Minister when Belhaj and Boudchar were abducted, hinted there is more to the story than he can publicly discuss. “There’s a lot of things in this case, some of which have been out in the media, some of which have not,” he said.

The human rights organisation Reprieve is calling for a full, judge-led public inquiry, to establish how Britain let these innocent people down so badly and uncover the extent of UK involvement in rendition and torture.

Reprieve’s Director Maya Foa said: “This judgement shows how important it is for the courts to hold torturers and their enablers to account. Sadly abuses like these are not just part of history. Donald Trump has just appointed Gina Haspel, who oversaw the US torture and rendition programme, to lead the CIA, so it is all the more important we know the full truth of British involvement. The Prime Minister’s apology to Mr Belhaj and Ms Boudchar is an important first step, the next must be a full public inquiry.”

* Reprieve


Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.