Secret RCEP trade deal fails international standards of transparency, experts warn

By agency reporter
July 21, 2018

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is being negotiated in Bangkok, Thailand. The regional trade deal involving 16 nations from Asia-Pacific will impact the lives of over three billion people, yet a new study reveals how the deal fails international standards of transparency and public engagement.

Experts measured the RCEP negotiations against criteria for Transparency and Public Participation in policy making. The outcome was a resounding 'fail'. The report finds the RCEP negotiations to be:

  • Non-transparent: negligible public availability of official information on the state of negations, a failure to release draft texts and adequate details of key government positions
  • Lacking in independent social, economic and environmental impact assessments, making it particularly difficult for journalists to accurately report on the trade deal
  • Plagued by numerous examples of vested interests influencing the process, such as corporations holding privileged semi-official roles in negotiations
  • Deprived of Asian parliaments and elected officials representation and input. They are frequently shut out, have no meaningful role in negotiations and often cannot access the text
  • Devoid of public participation, which amounted to, at best, token or ad hoc stakeholder engagements.

Sam Cossar, Friends of the Earth International, said, "RCEP is a secret trade deal that fails to live up to internationally recognised standards. Secrecy breeds corruption and bad decisions. People have a right to know what is being negotiated in their name."

Benny Kuruvilla of the Transnational Institute said, "In India, the process of negotiating RCEP has been characterised by not just lack of parliamentary scrutiny but also the complete non involvement of regional governments who will bear the brunt of cheaper agricultural and manufacturing imports. Elected representatives such as the Chief Minister of the southern Indian state of Kerala are arguing that this is a violation of the principle of federalism that is enshrined in the Indian constitution."

Kate Lappin from Public Services International (PSI) said, "Trade unions across Asia Pacific are opposed to the RCEP because it is anti-democratic, anti-worker and anti-people. It is a threat to quality public services essential to advancing rights for all people. Governments have made commitments to tri-partism; to involve workers and employers in setting policies that impact on labour rights. Instead, governments appear to be taking instructions from the largest foreign multinational companies and protecting their interests."

Joseph Purugganan of Focus on the Global South said, "The resounding call of peoples' movements is for governments to reject RCEP. Yet governments continue to ignore this call by undermining people’s efforts to secure access to the negotiating texts and restricting spaces for people’s participation in the negotiating process. The democratic deficit in RCEP is made worse by the privileged access given to corporations."

Rachmi Hertanti, Director, Indonesia for Global Justice said, "The space for democratic process in the RCEP negotiation should be opened. If this democratic space doesn’t exist then the RCEP must be rejected as violating human rights."

* Read the report RCEP A secret deal here

* Friends of the Earth International


Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.