Resumption of bailiff visits in England and Wales 'rushed and premature'

By agency reporter
August 26, 2020

The five-month suspension of bailiff activity in England and Wales ended on 24 August 2020. The debt charity StepChange welcomed last minute Government guidance published on Friday 21 August, but has serious concerns that this resumption of activity is premature.

The government’s own rationale for suspending activity – because “financial pressures [from firms and creditors]” would create the risk of poor practice and unnecessary visits “which could endanger the health of both enforcement agents and debtors” – has not changed, says the charity.

With the risks of the pandemic still very much present, StepChange says this alone should have been enough to extend the suspension – as  has happened in relation to tenancy evictions – quite apart from the case for seeking to mitigate the stress and pressure that bailiff activity imposes on those whose circumstances leave them unable to pay in these unprecedented times.

The charity says it is pleased that the Government responded to advice sector concerns about inadequate industry safeguards by publishing its own guidance for bailiffs. This brings some clarity and substance on how bailiffs should conduct visits safely, especially in relation to vulnerable households particularly at risk of the virus. However, with bailiffs unable to enter people’s homes to take control of goods it still questions the purpose of bailiff visits, which will add £235 to people’s bills.

Given that the economic consequences of the crisis have hit struggling households hardest, the Government should be helping people who have fallen behind, not making it harder for them to repay their debts, says StepChange.

Even with improved guidance, the Government has very little power to ensure bailiffs (also known as enforcement agents) follow the rules when they return to work.

The slow response from the Government, the inadequate initial attempt at guidance by CIVEA (the bailiff trade association), and the lack of effective enforcement of the rules demonstrates the need for stronger independent oversight of the sector, as StepChange has been urging the Ministry of Justice for a considerable time, well before the pandemic.

Director of External Affairs at StepChange Richard Lane says: “This rushed and premature return to bailiff activity puts people at risk and will make debts harder to repay. We welcome the Government’s new guidance on how these visits should be conducted, but we still have concerns about how it will ensure this guidance is followed. We would also question, while still in the midst of the crisis, whether bailiff visits are a useful way to deal with arrears from vulnerable households.

“The lack of oversight only highlights the urgent and longstanding need for an independent regulator. We are pleased that the government was mindful of our concerns, but fundamental reform remains essential.”

* If you need free confidential debt advice, or have been contacted by a bailiff and are worried about a potential home visit contact StepChange here

* StepChange https://www.stepchange.org/

[Ekk/6]

Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.