Polling suggests US voters uneasy about targeted online political advertising

By agency reporter
October 31, 2020

New polling, carried out by YouGov on behalf of Global Witness, in three key US swing States (Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin) amongst regular social media users, indicates that nearly seven in 10 (68 per cent) think online advertisers should ensure political ads are viewable by everyone. Just 15 per cent think these ads should be targeted and only made available to certain groups. It also suggests the majority of those who identify with both main parties (68 per cent Democrat and 63 per cent Republican) would support a ban on online political ads that are targeted at them.

The new data shows that around one in two (54 per cent) people have seen ads on their social media feeds questioning the validity of the US election in the last month or longer, and of this, 19 per cent say they could ‘rarely’ or ‘never’ identify who was funding those ads.

Overall, 50 per cent of respondents see targeted political ads hindering US democracy.

The digital battleground has been key for Democrats and Republicans alike, with both spending millions to target potential swing voters and aid their efforts to get out the vote. In the last quarter, the combined sum spent on political ads in the US on the presidential contest, congressional and gubernatorial races and amongst third-party groups advocating for candidates or specific causes topped $264 million on Facebook alone. The presidential campaigns were the biggest spenders, with the Trump campaign funding $48.7 million of Facebook ads, compared to Biden’s $45.4 million. In 2016, the Trump campaign reportedly spent over $44 million between June and November, with Clinton spending only $28 million.

The polling for Global WItness suggests voters want targeting restrictions and more transparency for political ads on social media. This is especially important for ads that are more likely to stir up division or cement prejudice by using micro-targeting (advertising delivered to a niche audience based on personal data).

The data also shows:

  • 61 per cent of respondents thought social media companies should do more to provide information on how online advertising has been targeted, and 68 per cent believed political ads should be viewable by anyone, rather than targeted at specific groups;
  • 31 per cent said they would like to reduce the time they spend on social media. Of those, a majority (52 per cent) cited false information as one of the reasons for cutting down;
  • The majority of battleground voters in WI, PA, and OH believed they had seen advertising on social media that had been targeted at them because of their gender, location, age, race, previous voting record and personal data provided to social media sites.

There were particular concerns about targeting based on:

  • Race (71 per cent felt this should not be allowed);
  • Who you voted for at the last election (75 per cent felt this should not be allowed);
  • Income (83 per cent felt this should not be allowed);
  • Sexuality (80 per cent felt this should not be allowed)
  • And general online behaviour such as. browsing history, previous purchases etc. (82 per cent felt this should not be allowed)

Earlier this year, Global Witness launched a campaign to protect democracy and stop the spread of hate and disinformation online by supporting new laws to hold Big Tech to account.

In response to the findings from this polling, Head of the Digital Threats to Democracy campaign at Global Witness, Ava Lee, said: “Big Tech has pervaded our lives to an astonishing degree. Facebook has 2.7 billion monthly active users, and over 85 per cent of people using search engines go through Google. These platforms are the new public realms, where news is shared, friendships are formed and political movements rise and fall. But there is far too little regulation over how these platforms operate – and nowhere is this more true than in the case of political ads, where legislation to govern how political campaigns engage with voters has simply not kept pace with new technology. The current situation cannot continue. It is undermining democracy, embedding division, and has the potential to disenfranchise swathes of the population. It is time for governments to regulate Big Tech and, as a starting point, ban the use of micro-targeting for political advertising.

“The truth matters. Democracy matters. No one can see the long queues outside polling stations across the US and not want to make every effort to ensure the voice of all Americans can be heard equally in this election. It’s time to end the Wild West of political campaigning on digital platforms and start moving towards a world where social media companies are forced to operate to higher transparency standards, where hate and discrimination is not able to flourish unchecked and where power cannot be bought through targeted ads and the proliferation of misleading information.”

* More information here

* Global Witness https://www.globalwitness.org/en/


Although the views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Ekklesia, the article may reflect Ekklesia's values. If you use Ekklesia's news briefings please consider making a donation to sponsor Ekklesia's work here.