RESEARCH INTO MENTAL HEALTH CAN DO MORE to tackle mental health inequalities and support a more equitable recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic, according to a paper published by the Centre for Mental Health.
Fit for purpose? Addressing inequities in mental health research exacerbated by Covid-19 was produced on behalf of the Mental Health Research Group, an independent group of leaders in mental health in England.
The report finds that mental health research can do more to tackle deeply entrenched inequalities in the causes of poor mental health. It can help us to find new and better ways to promote good mental health, prevent mental illness and support people living with mental health difficulties.
But to do that, it needs to be open to new ways of working, different types of evidence, and a more diverse range of people to become involved in research. People experiencing mental ill health especially need more opportunities to lead, deliver and communicate research.
Systemic change in the ways mental health research is planned, funded and delivered in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic is called for in the report. It also calls on all those who carry out, fund or manage research to:
- Ensure wider representation of groups and communities that have been silenced or overlooked: especially racialised communities.
- Invest in widening the range of people and organisations that can access research funding: including community and user-led organisations.
- Ensure resources are targeted towards key areas that will help to build the evidence base for tackling mental health inequalities, including children and young people, prevention, and factors which influence mental health.
- Find ways to bring together and value different types of knowledge in the production of evidence to inform policy and practice.
The report includes examples of work wjich is taking place to address mental health inequalities and challenge inequities of power and influence within mental health research.
Neha Shah, City University, said: “Tackling inequities in mental health requires us to acknowledge which aspects of mental health are less well researched, to enable communities, those with lived experience, and silenced groups to engage with and be prioritised in research, and to reach out from disciplinary and professional silos to tackle problems collaboratively. This includes, but is not limited to people who have been diagnosed with mental illness and used clinical services.
“In the last year, we have all faced challenges, experienced losses and found ways to be resilient. We must acknowledge the wider environment which can support or threaten our mental health from childhood to old age. We call for funders and developers of today and tomorrow’s research to invest in different ways of working to ensure we address the whole of people’s experience and know how best to support people where and when they need it.”
Centre for Mental Health chief executive, Sarah Hughes, said: “Mental health research has been under-funded for decades. And even now, with greater awareness and interest, it remains poorly supported. But the research we have is also too narrow, with too few voices getting heard. The result is that policies and services that could make a difference are too easily dismissed for a ‘lack of evidence’. This has to change. We need more mental health research. And we need it to be more diverse, more challenging and more reflective of the people whose lives are being talked about. We want this paper to spur action at every level and create a vibrant, equitable and impactful mental health research economy for the future.”
Rebecca Gray, Maudsley Charity Chief Executive, said: “The obstacles and challenges to developing research that is truly driven by the needs of communities came in to sharp focus during the pandemic. As a funder that works across the boundaries of NHS, academia and community organisations, we were really keen to support the Royal Foundation and Centre for Mental Health in convening this expert group to think through these issues and highlight what needs to change.”
Mental health inequalities are closely related to social and economic inequalities. For example:
- Children from households with low incomes are four times as likely to have a serious mental health difficulty by the age of 11 as those from the wealthiest households.
- Men and women from Black African and Caribbean communities in the UK are more likely to be diagnosed with severe mental illness than white people, and three times more likely to be sectioned under the Mental Health Act.
- Women who have experienced violence and abuse are at a greater risk of mental ill health.
- Children and adults with a learning disability and autistic people are three times more likely to experience mental ill health.
* Read Fit for purpose? here.
* Source: Centre for Mental Health