Archbishop lauds universities as key to mature citizenship

-21/10/06

The Archbishop of


Archbishop lauds universities as key to mature citizenship

-21/10/06

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, who is himself a former senior academic, has said that universities have an essential role and responsibility to play in building up a healthy society.

He highlighted citizenship, religion and politics as three areas needing careful intellectual examination. The comments came during the Archbishopís visit to China.

In a lecture given at Wuhan University last week, Dr Williams traced the roots of the university system in the desire to nourish brad spiritual and moral maturity, as well as intellectual skill.

It was this combination, he declared, that provided a model for universities to continue their contribution to the ongoing debates on the moral dimensions of public life both in China and in the West.

Dr Williams averred that “the religious origins of the European university are not irrelevant. The presence of the churches and other recognised religious bodies within society today can often be seen as that of a ëcritical friendí ñ to use a favourite term ñ witnessing to different standards and expectations about human beings and so opening up a further dimension to human experience. They are not, of course, the same; and it would be wrong to say that all universities should somehow have a religious basis. But both challenge any idea that conflict is natural. Both speak of a reality around us that is at once ordered and mysterious, that enables both confidence and humility. Both therefore help to create what I have been calling the mature citizen. ”

The Archbishop, spiritual head of the worldís 77 million Anglicans, said that universities needed to avoid becoming prisoners of tradition, and should resist undue external pressure to produce rapid or commercial results from academic research. They also need to move beyond cultural or political expectations if they are to fulfil their potential, he claimed.

“The fundamental character of this role is not to do with the universityís success in meeting the material targets of the society, in the scale and size of its industrial or defence contracts, nor is it to do with the universityís unquestioning promotion of a single religious, philosophical or political ideologyî, said Dr Williams. ìInstead it is about the universityís capacity to help create mature citizens, persons who are free from certain sorts of prejudice and fear.”

He went on to comment that the best product of a university should not simply be technically qualified experts, but citizens of maturity and benevolence.

“[I]t is the person who has acquired the habit and virtue of learning, and who sees the social world as a place not primarily of struggle and conflict over control but as a context where conversation may be pursued with patience. And this is a deeply political matter, in the fullest sense of the much abused word ëpoliticalí. It alters what we think we can expect of each other; it challenges any assumption that conflict is the natural position for human beings; when there are clashes of interest, it tells us how to question what we have taken for granted about our own best interests and encourages us to seek for something new that is not just the property of one individual or faction.î

Concluded Dr Williams: ìThe university nourishes ëcivilityí ñ in the narrow sense of patience and courtesy in dispute, and in the much larger sense of concern for proper and open public life in the civitas, the city, the community of citizens.”

Before becoming Bishop of Monmouth, Archbishop of Wales and then Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Williamsí own university-based academic career included hold the Lady Margaret Hall chair of theology at the University of Oxford.


Archbishop lauds universities as key to mature citizenship

-21/10/06

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, who is himself a former senior academic, has said that universities have an essential role and responsibility to play in building up a healthy society.

He highlighted citizenship, religion and politics as three areas needing careful intellectual examination. The comments came during the Archbishopís visit to China.

In a lecture given at Wuhan University last week, Dr Williams traced the roots of the university system in the desire to nourish brad spiritual and moral maturity, as well as intellectual skill.

It was this combination, he declared, that provided a model for universities to continue their contribution to the ongoing debates on the moral dimensions of public life both in China and in the West.

Dr Williams averred that “the religious origins of the European university are not irrelevant. The presence of the churches and other recognised religious bodies within society today can often be seen as that of a ëcritical friendí ñ to use a favourite term ñ witnessing to different standards and expectations about human beings and so opening up a further dimension to human experience. They are not, of course, the same; and it would be wrong to say that all universities should somehow have a religious basis. But both challenge any idea that conflict is natural. Both speak of a reality around us that is at once ordered and mysterious, that enables both confidence and humility. Both therefore help to create what I have been calling the mature citizen. ”

The Archbishop, spiritual head of the worldís 77 million Anglicans, said that universities needed to avoid becoming prisoners of tradition, and should resist undue external pressure to produce rapid or commercial results from academic research. They also need to move beyond cultural or political expectations if they are to fulfil their potential, he claimed.

“The fundamental character of this role is not to do with the universityís success in meeting the material targets of the society, in the scale and size of its industrial or defence contracts, nor is it to do with the universityís unquestioning promotion of a single religious, philosophical or political ideologyî, said Dr Williams. ìInstead it is about the universityís capacity to help create mature citizens, persons who are free from certain sorts of prejudice and fear.”

He went on to comment that the best product of a university should not simply be technically qualified experts, but citizens of maturity and benevolence.

“[I]t is the person who has acquired the habit and virtue of learning, and who sees the social world as a place not primarily of struggle and conflict over control but as a context where conversation may be pursued with patience. And this is a deeply political matter, in the fullest sense of the much abused word ëpoliticalí. It alters what we think we can expect of each other; it challenges any assumption that conflict is the natural position for human beings; when there are clashes of interest, it tells us how to question what we have taken for granted about our own best interests and encourages us to seek for something new that is not just the property of one individual or faction.î

Concluded Dr Williams: ìThe university nourishes ëcivilityí ñ in the narrow sense of patience and courtesy in dispute, and in the much larger sense of concern for proper and open public life in the civitas, the city, the community of citizens.”

Before becoming Bishop of Monmouth, Archbishop of Wales and then Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Williamsí own university-based academic career included hold the Lady Margaret Hall chair of theology at the University of Oxford.