Anglicans and Catholics state position on neonatal care
-15/11/06
The Rt Rev Tom Butle
Anglicans and Catholics state position on neonatal care
-15/11/06
The Rt Rev Tom Butler, Anglican Bishop of Southwark, and Most Rev Peter Smith, Catholic Archbishop of Cardiff, have issued a joint statment on behalf of the Church of England House of Bishops and the Catholic Bishopsí Conference of England and Wales regarding the publication of the Nuffield Councilís report Critical care decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine: Ethical issues.
They write: “We warmly welcome the clear recommendation from the Nuffield Council today that ‘the active ending of life of newborn babies should not be allowed, no matter how serious their condition.’ This reaffirms the validity of existing law prohibiting euthanasia, and upholds the vital and fundamental moral principle that the deliberate taking of innocent human life is always gravely wrong.
“There is a clear distinction between interventions which are deliberately aimed at killing, and decisions to withhold or withdraw medical treatment when it is judged to be futile or unduly burdensome. In our joint submission in 2004 to the Select Committee of the Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill, the Church of England House of Bishops and the Catholic Bishopsí Conference of England and Wales said:
“‘Doctors do not have an overriding obligation to prolong life by all available means. Treatment for a dying patient should be ‘proportionate’ to the therapeutic effect to be expected, and should not be disproportionately painful, intrusive, risky, or costly, in the circumstances. Treatment may therefore be withheld or withdrawn, though such decisions should be guided by the principle that a pattern of care should never be adopted with the intention, purpose or aim of terminating the life or bringing about the death of a patient. Death, if it ensues, will have resulted from the underlying condition which required medical intervention, not as a direct consequence of the decision to withhold or withdraw treatment.’ (para 18)
“In applying this principle we believe that every case should be judged on its merits and like the British Medical Association, we would have concerns about any blanket recommendation regarding the treatment of babies born before 22 weeks. Decisions regarding treatment should always be made on an individual basis having regard to all the circumstances of the case.
“We will wish to study the detail of the Nuffield Councilís report but welcome the extremely important recommendation opposing any action aimed at the active ending of life of newborn babies.”
Anglicans and Catholics state position on neonatal care
-15/11/06
The Rt Rev Tom Butler, Anglican Bishop of Southwark, and Most Rev Peter Smith, Catholic Archbishop of Cardiff, have issued a joint statment on behalf of the Church of England House of Bishops and the Catholic Bishopsí Conference of England and Wales regarding the publication of the Nuffield Councilís report Critical care decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine: Ethical issues.
They write: “We warmly welcome the clear recommendation from the Nuffield Council today that ‘the active ending of life of newborn babies should not be allowed, no matter how serious their condition.’ This reaffirms the validity of existing law prohibiting euthanasia, and upholds the vital and fundamental moral principle that the deliberate taking of innocent human life is always gravely wrong.
“There is a clear distinction between interventions which are deliberately aimed at killing, and decisions to withhold or withdraw medical treatment when it is judged to be futile or unduly burdensome. In our joint submission in 2004 to the Select Committee of the Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill, the Church of England House of Bishops and the Catholic Bishopsí Conference of England and Wales said:
“‘Doctors do not have an overriding obligation to prolong life by all available means. Treatment for a dying patient should be ‘proportionate’ to the therapeutic effect to be expected, and should not be disproportionately painful, intrusive, risky, or costly, in the circumstances. Treatment may therefore be withheld or withdrawn, though such decisions should be guided by the principle that a pattern of care should never be adopted with the intention, purpose or aim of terminating the life or bringing about the death of a patient. Death, if it ensues, will have resulted from the underlying condition which required medical intervention, not as a direct consequence of the decision to withhold or withdraw treatment.’ (para 18)
“In applying this principle we believe that every case should be judged on its merits and like the British Medical Association, we would have concerns about any blanket recommendation regarding the treatment of babies born before 22 weeks. Decisions regarding treatment should always be made on an individual basis having regard to all the circumstances of the case.
“We will wish to study the detail of the Nuffield Councilís report but welcome the extremely important recommendation opposing any action aimed at the active ending of life of newborn babies.”